THIS WEEK’S DEBATE: I encourage players to try other sports but one of my lads is now playing county rugby and his commitments interfere with soccer training. Is it fair he should miss our matches because he hasn't trained? MORE
Formations can help teams to play to their strengths – but you need to know which one suits your team. To help you, we look at 3-3-2. This is one of the best formations to coach young players as a good, solid base to defend and attack.
- PROS: The simplest of all formations for 9v9, 3-3-2 is easy to understand, good for wide players and has good recovery lines when ball is lost.
- CONS: This formation is weak in attack and relies on good support from midfield for attacking success. It also relies on good support from fullbacks to the midfield.
As a formation, the 3-3-2 is naturally a defensive shape. After losing the ball a team can quickly recover and get tight, shrinking the space in midfield and defence.
The midfield must link the defence with attack and also support the attack, which has only two players. The formation offers a natural route for wing play from the two wide players supported by the two fullbacks.
The weakest part of the formation, the attackers will usually be outnumbered and need support from the midfield. They will have to work hard to press the opposition defence when they have lost the ball.
In most teams you will have players who are more developed than others. The theory is that putting these players in the centre of the field will give them the best chance to be directly involved in the play. From an individual’s
development viewpoint, you want to give them some time out wide because it’s more of a 1v1 situation than what you experience centrally and there is more space for dribbling. This formation forces midfielders to support the play so helps to create box to box players who can take shots at goal or cross the ball. Defensively three at the back is a good base to coach skills the will help them to win the ball like pressing and jockeying.